I'm getting a little teensy, tiny complex. It's Shana, the heroine from Serengeti Storm. People keep throwing around the phrase 'unlikeable' when they are talking about her. Now, at first, I was all worried about that. They hate my book! They will never read another book of mine! I have sabotaged my entire career! Oh noes!
Then, after a cathartic brownie nosh, I got to thinking...
I like Shana. I like her a lot. I respect her strength and determination. So how do you define likeable? I am able to like her... but I'm the minority, apparently. So is it majority rule? Or is likeability defined by societal virtues of womanhood - essentially that she be sweet and nurturing and kind and considerate... (and a doormat)... and barefoot and pregnant and... Okay, I'll just stop right there before I devolve into a feminist rant.
Shana has virtues... but they aren't typically feminine virtues. She's physically strong. She's mentally tough. She's independent, ambitious and driven. She is, above all else, a survivor. But none of those things are "nice girl" things. So does that make her unlikeable?
If you read Serengeti Storm and totally hated Shana, I'd be curious as to what about her particularly set you off. Yes, she's nasty to Caleb, but he has done his fair share of hurting her too.
Is gender the double standard? What if Shana were a guy? Would he be unlikeable or would he just be a "bad boy" with his sexified crankiness? (There's a thread at Dear Author talking about the male/female double standard in romance if you're interested.)
Also, I'm not entirely sure that I would be considered a "likeable" heroine if someone made me a character in a romance novel. I don't value "nice" above "competent", and sometimes that comes across as "bitchy". I do not have the milk of human kindness flowing in my veins. If anything, my veins have an excess of vitriol. Strength of character is more important to me than likeability and I have a notoriously flexible moral compass... which I guess is only a virtue in a heroine if she is bending the rules to save babies or puppies. Am I unlikeable? Or do we have different rules for real people & romance heroines? Must fictional heroines be paragons of virtue we seek to emulate?
My goal in creating Shana was to make her believable and realistic, perhaps even sympathetic, but not a paragon of anything. I knew her story was a little more intense than the first shifter novella, but I never realized I was going to be bombarded by comments with that one word haunting them all - unlikeable. (Perhaps it was stupid of me not to realize, but it's the truth.)
See, the heroines I find unlikeable are the ones who are poorly written. The ones who are ridiculously unrealistic. Or (and this is my biggest pet peeve) when a heroine is described one way by everyone who talks about her, but behaves a totally different way. Like when everyone talks about what a brilliant Rhodes scholar she is, but she can't even perform basic deductive reasoning. That bugs me.
I wasn't bothered when one reviewer called Lucy from The Ghost Shrink, the Accidental Gigolo & the Poltergeist Accountant "too stupid to live", because, well, she acts emotionally and impetuously. She's a reactive person and sometimes that results in a belated "what the frick were you thinking?" Yep, there are moments of ripe stupidity from her in that book, but honestly many of us have moments of ripe stupidity. (Which has caused Helen Kay Dimon to ask that the TSTL tag be put on notice.)
Maybe I'm only reacting to the term "unlikeable" because I keep seeing it popping up in conversations about romance novels lately. There's a thread here at Dear Author about unlikeable heroines and the readers who love them - but I honestly didn't find any of the heroines painted with the "unlikeable" brush in that article to actually be unlikeable. Because I liked them all. I would like us to stop equating strong, complex, difficult women with unlikeability. Could we do that please?
So tell me, how essential is heroine likeability to you? Would you rather have a heroine in a book be realistic or a paragon of womanly virtue? What virtues do you value in people? Are they different than the virtues you value in characters?
5 comments:
My goal in creating Shana was to make her believable and realistic, perhaps even sympathetic, but not a paragon of anything. I knew her story was a little more intense than the first shifter novella, but I never realized I was going to be bombarded by comments with that one word haunting them all - unlikeable. (Perhaps it was stupid of me not to realize, but it's the truth.)
Unlikeable? Really? She's flawed, yes. She's stubborn and selfish and not your typical sweeter than pie heroine, but that just made her character development and growth all the more interesting...
(And I've never found you bitchy once... ;) )
I've said it before and I'll say it again for the record. I like bitches. Mostly because they're real and partly because they're more like me.
Perfect people don't have a lot of room to grow, yes they can get the guy, but that's not all I want to read. Flawed people are far more interesting. Bitchy ones even more so.
Hey Vivi. I haven't read it yet but it's on my tbr pile. Personally I love heroines who can channel their inner-bitch. I think IRL if you aren't part bitch then it's hard to survive! Don't take this to heart and keep creating work that speaks to you, it'll find its way to the right readers. You can't please everyone!
I think Serengeti Heat set me up to dislike Shana. I related closely to Ava -- the one who appears to be a runt but really is a strong backbone for her family. I read the two stories on back to back weekends, so Shana's slights to Ava felt all the more fresh. Perhaps I continued to see her as a foil rather than a heroine in her own right.
@Laurie - Yeah, she's definitely flawed. Her faults are many, but perfection is just so darned limiting. (And I'm glad I've managed to keep my bitch-tastic tendencies under wraps;))
@Kali - Do perfect people really exist? How boring their lives must be without flaws! ;)
@Annie - Thanks for the reminder that we have to write the stories we love... even if they aren't all as universally beloved as we might like. :)
@Carly - I can definitely see that people who related strongly with Ava would be hard pressed to look past Shana's obnoxious tendencies. I would be very curious to hear what readers who trip across Storm first think of the pair of them. Thanks for the feedback! :)
Post a Comment